UK case law
Nursing & Midwifery Council, R (on the application of) v Steadman
[2012] EWHC ADMIN 1030 · High Court (Administrative Court) · 2012
The verbatim text of this UK judgment. Sourced directly from The National Archives Find Case Law. Not an AI summary, not a paraphrase — every word below is the original ruling, under Crown copyright and the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Full judgment
1. MR JUSTICE SINGH: I will grant your application with some hesitation. My hesitation comes from the fact that, as is recognised, this case has been going on now for several years. Nevertheless it is clear to me that the order needs to be made now because the reason for the long period of delay lies in the past. More recently, the background is that the respondent has not appeared when the case has been listed for hearing. The committee has been concerned not to hear the case in her absence.
2. The background is clearly a serious one because the allegations concern theft of drugs by a nurse. The public interest clearly requires that this application should be granted.
3. I am informed that the case has now been listed for a hearing on 30 April 2012. In those circumstances I recognise that the just order to make would be to continue the interim order for a further period of three months. Therefore I grant the extension for three months.
4. MR PRETTY: I hand up a draft order. There is no application for costs.
5. MR JUSTICE SINGH: Shall I deal with that now today or reserve it?
6. MR PRETTY: There will be no further application for costs so you can deal with it today.
7. MR JUSTICE SINGH: I will do that. I hand the order to the associate with the court papers. Thank you for your assistance.