Pensions Ombudsman determination
Pension Protection Fund · CAS-53215-W0T5
Verbatim text of this Pensions Ombudsman determination. Sourced directly from the Pensions Ombudsman published register. The Pensions Ombudsman is a statutory tribunal — its determinations are public record. Not an AI summary, not a paraphrase.
Full determination
CAS-53215-W0T5
Ombudsman’s Determination Applicant: Mr Y
Scheme: Pension Protection Fund (PPF)
Respondent: The Board of the Pension Protection Fund (the Board)
Outcome
Complaint summary
Background information, including submissions from the parties Background
1 CAS-53215-W0T5
1 PO-23320
2 CAS-53215-W0T5
Mr Y’s position
3 CAS-53215-W0T5
The Board’s position
Adjudicator’s Opinion
2 Generally speaking, in a defined benefit scheme, members are promised a certain level of pension and the
scheme is funded to meet this promise; whereas, in a defined contribution scheme, the pension will depend upon how much the member has by way of funds and the market cost of buying a pension at retirement. 4 CAS-53215-W0T5
5 CAS-53215-W0T5
Mr Y did not accept the Adjudicator’s Opinion and the complaint was passed to me to consider. Mr Y provided further comments which are summarised below. I note the points raised by Mr Y, but I do not find that they change the outcome. I agree with the Adjudicator’s Opinion.
Mr Y’s further comments
6 CAS-53215-W0T5 Ombudsman’s decision
3 Also known as a final salary scheme. 4 Bank of England inflation calculator based on an average annual inflation of 2.8% between 1991 and 2019. 5 Also known as a money purchase arrangement.
7 CAS-53215-W0T5
I do not uphold Mr Y’s complaint.
Anthony Arter Pensions Ombudsman
18 November 2021
8